This means that the country would be left at the stake of only the military and the citizens would not have the power of protecting their government, as well as, the best interests of their nation Lott Another main reason why the second amendment was made was that the South would be able to control the slaves.
Guns would be essential in helping carry out slavery in the South at ease. Therefore, state militias served as slave patrols where they had to be given the mandate and responsibility to hold guns so that they would be able to control the slaves.
The second amendment was also made because of the rebellions that used to take place in the country. For example, the whiskey rebellion caused the government to revoke the amendment as a way of controlling the militias in helping stop the rebellion.
The farmers were rebelling against the government for imposing a new tax, yet it had not been there previously. When the amendment was made, room for rebel had not been created against the government. However, such rebellions were experienced when the government was not in a position to meet certain needs of the people or it acted in such a way that people viewed as selfish or had corrupt intentions.
For this reason, the state has been enjoying its democratic right because rebellions and demonstrations are respected because the government realizes the power within the people. If such power had not been vested in the people, it would be difficult in the United States to stage rebellions and demonstrations in fight for human rights and freedom. Imposing gun control laws in the country is, therefore, a way of curtailing freedom in the United States, as the people may lack the voice and the authority they had previously Bijlefeld There has also been an argument that it is not the guns that kill people, but it is the people themselves who kill other people.
In this context, those against the gun controls argue that it is a personal initiative for a criminal to engage in crime, whether he holds a gun or not. In this regard, he does not have to possess gun for him to hold a gun. More comparisons are made between other weapons that are used to kill people and the guns that are always blamed for being used in killing people.
People use crude weapons including screwdrivers, knives, swords or any metallic objects if they have the intention to kill other people. The gun just necessitates and quickens the process, and they argue that the killing would still have taken place, in the absence of the gun.
Therefore, before placing the gun control laws as a measure to reduce violence and crime, more research should be indulged and there should be other actions that ought to be taken as a way of reducing the violence.
For example, most people who commit these crimes are usually in the influence of high drug intoxication.
It is these drugs that will make them use the guns or other weapons around them in committing violence. The best way to help reduce violence in such a person would not be confiscating the gun he is carrying, but rehabilitating him as a way to reduce the drug use in him. This is because even after taking the gun, the drug effects may show him to use other weapons to commit the crime.
However, when he has been led out of using the drugs, he will not use the gun wrongly, and will continue keeping and bearing it for the right purpose, which is self- defense and protecting the interests of the nation, as outlined in the constitution Dixon, Ideally, the legislations that have been created for gun control are meant for the criminals.
It goes without saying that criminals do not follow the law, and making such legislation does not stop them from committing their crimes. Criminals are very conversant with the laws and they intentionally break them so that they get what they want. The new laws that have been created for gun control are, therefore, going to affect the citizens who are not criminals and are held illegible to carry the guns.
This would be unfair to them because the criminals will always have their own ways to hide and use the guns even when the new laws are being put into practice. With this in mind, the rate of crime and violence is likely to shoot up since it is in the knowledge of the criminals that people are not holding guns, and they can, therefore, use their guns more freely than they would have used them when people are holding guns Spitzer It has also been concluded that gun laws do not work in any way.
This is in reference of earlier legislations that had been placed in hopes that they would be able to regulate gun violence. For instance, there was a law that existed between and The law required that no one was allowed to carry guns, but it did not work as gun violence did not reduce, as expected.
This shows that there is little or no correlation between gun violence and the enactment of the ban on firearm holding in the U. The legislation itself had loopholes, which the criminals used in keeping and using the guns wrongly. Other factors that may have a higher degree of correlation with gun violence are factors such as having mental illness and using drugs wrongly. When the government concentrates on confiscating guns on a measure to reduce gun violence, it will lose the track and violence will still be on the rise.
It should focus on other solutions, and gun control should come last when other measures are working. Therefore, it has been clearly indicated why it is important in letting people hold guns and why gun legislation should not be enacted.
More safety and security of the state will be ensured when the government embarks on other measure to help stop gun violence in the U.
Researchers have already found out that there is negative correlation between gun legislation and gun violence. You should think of it as valuable training. Besides, to write an excellent argumentative essay, you need a solid understanding of both "your" argument and the opposing one. So, on the bright side, you already have that. Once you have that, you move on to research. As you may guess, you should not focus on your side of the argument exclusively.
On the contrary, a strong gun control argumentative essay has to present two conflicting views on the issue. So, you have to conduct some research in both directions. After conducting your research, you should outline your essay and move on to writing. Like any other essay, your argumentative essay on gun control will consist of three parts: The introduction is where you present your topic, some background information, and your opinion which you set out to prove in your essay.
The main body is where you present both sides of the argument and your opinion on the issue along with an explanation of why you stand in favor of this particular opinion. Finally, you conclude your gun control argumentative essay with re-stating your opinion and pointing out why it makes sense.
On a first glance, a persuasive essay may seem not that much different from an argumentative one. However, there is a drastic difference between them. An argumentative essay focuses on proving your point logically, whereas a persuasive essay is aimed at convincing your reader that you are right.
This may seem vague, so let us take a closer look. There are three commonly accepted ways of persuasion: Ethos appeals to the reader's sense of ethics and employs the author's authority on the issue.
Pathos appeals to the reader's emotions and employs the irrational. Logos appeals to the reader's common sense and employs logic. In an argumentative essay, you are essentially limited to logos, whereas in a persuasive essay you can use all three methods of persuasion in any combination. The tragic events that lead to the actuality of the gun control discussion are heavily loaded with both emotion and authoritative opinions.
So, writing a gun control persuasive essay and using whichever methods of persuasion you like should be easier than writing an argumentative essay and using only logic and rationality. For example, in a persuasive essay, you can use somewhat emotional language which you are to avoid by all means in an argumentative essay. As for the pre-writing and writing process, a persuasive essay will indeed be very similar to an argumentative one: The only distinguishing feature is that in your concluding paragraphs you not only explain why your standpoint is right but also dwell upon why the opposing standpoint is wrong.
As we have mentioned, gun control is a very broad topic, and if you choose or have to write about it, you can go as deep and as broad as you want. So, it can be a simple five-paragraph essay or a profound gun control research paper.
However, a research paper is still too small a paper to cover all there is about gun control, so you will have to narrow down your topic. Hence, picking the right topic should be your first step.
Your topic should not only be exciting to you, but the format of the research paper also demands that it was original - so that you had something new or, at least, relatively new to say about it. Most likely, you can remain flexible about your topic up until the moment when you begin the actual writing. This means that in the course of your research you may come across some new data which will suggest a more exciting topic, so you should be ready for it and not be afraid to change the subject on the go.
The format of a research paper also suggests that you use more sources in your research than in a simple five-paragraph essay. Most often, you will have to cite at least five sources. Moreover, in a research paper, it is recommended to rely not only on printed materials but also on your empirical research.
To conclude, a research paper - as the name suggests - centers around what researchers have to say on the topic. This means that you should focus on the research data that already exists in a given field rather than on opinions, including your own. Obviously, gun control is the kind of topic that inspires bias. This suggests a lot of opinions on the issue - some more reasoned than others.
Regardless of what essay you are writing, it is a piece of academic writing and cannot be a "naked" presentation of an opinion. All suggestions that you make in your essay have to be substantiated with solid evidence. Therefore, an extensive research is necessary for any kind of paper on gun control. This involves both the background of the issue and the pro and anti gun control arguments. As we have already mentioned, any talk about gun control goes down to the Second Amendment to the Constitution - so, this is where your research should begin.
The amendment was passed over years ago, and it has been clarified by quite a few precedent court cases over the years, on both state and federal levels - so, it is only beneficial for you to be informed about those. The most notable cases include United States v.
Cruikshank , the United States v. Miller , District of Columbia v. Heller , McDonald v. Chicago , and others. Once you are familiar with these, you can say that you are familiar with the historical background of the issue. Gun control is a polarizing topic, so you probably already had your own opinion about it. Now that you have more insight into the background of the issue, your opinion will be more reasoned. Nevertheless, no piece of academic writing should be exclusively opinion-based.
So, you should also be well-informed about what experts have to say on the issue from both sides of the argument. The most obvious way to find those is to look through the gun control articles, analytics and documentaries on the topic from respectable media like Business Week, CNN, LA Times, New Yorker, etc. Anti gun control articles argue that the turnover and possession should either not be controlled any more than it is, or not be controlled at all.
Here are some of the recent examples of such articles from reputable media:. In his article, he claims that gun control tendencies are purely populist and should they succeed, they do not specify with the already existing massive amount of guns possessed by individuals.
Godines Kersey English 11 Anti Gun Control 9/16/13 To have gun control laws or not to have gun control laws that is the question. Recent tragedies involving firearms have sparked up a controversial debate in America.
Gun control is such a broad topic that a gun control essay can be virtually anything. The issue can be seen from so many angles and discussed on so many levels, that you can tackle such an issue however you like in your essay.
Essay on Gun Control There have been arguments regarding the gun control in the United States where some people have been on the idea that laws on gun control should be enhanced while others supported the idea that they should be scrapped and there should no be rules governing gun control . A gun control essay thesis should definitely contain a classical argument, and many samples and examples show this. Rogerian Argument This study works effectively when you are trying to persuade your audience into accepting your position by identifying points of compromise and agreement.
Gun Control Essay. Today, gun control has become one of those topics that everybody talks about. And there is no surprise in that, considering the tragic events that took place recently. Persuasive gun control essay. A persuasive essay is much like an argumentative one, only you don't just convey your argument, but you are to persuade your reader - often with a polar opinion on the issue - that your viewpoint is the right one.