Yet we continue to take life as a means of protecting life. Our natural rights as humans, which cannot be taken away by the government, include the right to life.
Humans are not cold metal coins that lose value; no act, no matter how heinous, can make a person less of a human being.
The death penalty is favored by some as an effective deterrent of crime; however, it is proven that states with the death penalty actually have higher murder rates than those without. It is proven that our nation does not need this extreme threat of punishment to prevent crime. It can be said that the death penalty is the most overlooked form of government hypocrisy; we murder people who murder people to show that murder is wrong.
It is this contradiction in policy that confuses criminals and undermines any crime deterrence capital punishment was intended to have. Losing a loved one, no matter how that person is lost, is unbearable, irrevocable, and shattering. Nevertheless, when execution day arrives, the pain is not eased. No relief can be gained, for their pain is an unavoidable, natural process of life. Capital punishment is immoral and a violation of natural rights.
It is wrong for everyone involved: We need to replace the death penalty and capital punishment with life without parole, a safer and more inexpensive option. Nothing good comes of hate, and nothing good can ever come from capital punishment. It cannot continue to be accepted by a nation that claims to have liberty and justice for all. Which of your works would you like to tell your friends about?
These links will automatically appear in your email. If you have a suggestion about this website or are experiencing a problem with it, or if you need to report abuse on the site, please let us know. We try to make TeenInk. Please note that while we value your input, we cannot respond to every message. Also, if you have a comment about a particular piece of work on this website, please go to the page where that work is displayed and post a comment on it.
Don't have an account? Sign up for one. Wrong email address or password! Summer Program Reviews College Reviews. Writers Workshop Regular Forums. Program Links Program Reviews. I like this 0. The idea of putting another human to death is hard to completely fathom. The physical mechanics involved in the act of execution are easy to grasp, but the emotions involved in carrying out a death sentence on another person, regardless of how much they deserve it, is beyond my own understanding.
However, this act is sometimes necessary and it is our responsibility as a society to see that it is done. Opponents of capital punishment have basically four arguments. The first is that there is a possibility of error. However, the chance that there might be an error is separate from the issue of whether the death penalty can be justified or not. If an error does occur, and an innocent person is executed, then the problem lies in the court system, not in the death penalty.
Furthermore, most activities in our world, in which humans are involved, possess a possibility of injury or death. Construction, sports, driving, and air travel all offer the possibility of accidental death even though the highest levels of precautions are taken. These activities continue to take place, and continue to occasionally take human lives, because we have all decided, as a society, that the advantages outweigh the unintended loss.
We have also decided that the advantages of having dangerous murderers removed from our society outweigh the losses of the offender. The second argument against capital punishment is that it is unfair in its administration. Statistics show that the poor and minorities are more likely to receive the death penalty.
Once again, this is a separate issue. However, this is yet another problem of our current court system. The racial and economic bias is not a valid argument against the death penalty. It is an argument against the courts and their unfair system of sentencing. This act has been overtaken by events. State institutions should not execute citizens in the name of law or maintaining order. There is a widely held fallacy that death penalty effectively achieves its objectives.
Facts, however, disapprove this. The main reason why death penalty was instituted was to deter crime but available evidence speaks against this. There are other ways that crime can be deterred. Mark and Hurwitz note that controlling drugs use and, reducing the number of guns in the hands of civilians, are two ways that can effectively control crime. According to these authors, Death penalty comes last in the list of possible ways of deterring crime.
Long life sentence, as a matter of fact, is a better method of controlling and deterring crime compared to death penalty. Death penalty is usually applied arbitrarily and is most of the times irrevocable.
This means that application of death pealty denies the due process of law Bedau 4. Victims once convicted are denied the right to benefit from new evidence that may come up after conviction.
Life in parole sentences are advocated for by many who are against death penalty as victims may have a chance of being acquitted once new evidence comes up. In the United States and other heterogeneous societies, the public and civil societies always feel that death penalty is violates the constitutional right of equality and protection.
Available statistical data from different states in the United States prove that death sentence is never applied fairly. There are more blacks who have been executed compared to other races Frederick This does not necessarily mean that blacks are involved more in crime compared to their white or colored counterparts.
Instead of people arguing every now and then that Race is not the only factor that determines whether a suspect criminal ends being convicted to die or not. Other factors like education status and social status have been quoted as other basis used to disproportionately apply death penalty Those who advocate for death penalty argue that death penalty has far reaching economic benefits compared to other forms of sentencing like life without parole.
They argue that maintaining a life sentence criminal costs nations lots of resources compared to death penalty.
The title is Arguments against the Death Penalty yet the author spent the whole time counterclaiming any arguments brought up rather than explaining the logistics behind the arguments. No side was taken in this essay however the title clearly states that the essay should be on arguments against.
Against The Death Penalty Essay Words | 4 Pages. Against the Death Penalty “Murder is wrong” (“Capital Punishment”). We’ve been taught this indisputable truth since childhood. The death penalty is defined as one human taking the life of another. Coincidentally, that is a classification of murder.
Custom Against the Death Penalty Essay Writing Service || Against the Death Penalty Essay samples, help There are a number of issues that are considered controversial in our modern society. Some of these issues are death penalty, abortion and euthanasia. Third, the death penalty goes against our Human Right Bill. On December 10, , United Nations adopted the Human Rights Bill. According to Article 5 states that "No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment".
(Religious Organizing Against the Death Penalty Website) The main argument that advocates for the death penalty have is that the death penalty deters crime, that the threat of execution is enough to make criminals think twice about committing a capital crime. /5(10). Argumentative Against Death Penalty Essay Abolishment of Capital Punishment Capital punishment should be abolished for the following reasons. 1) It violates the Eight Amendment of the use of cruel and unusual punishment, for which the Supreme Court has vacillated.